In this episode, we examine the assumptions about the speed of light which evolutionists use to attempt to debunk creationism.
References:
Creationist Arguments
Isaac Newton’s “Opticks”
Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity
Speed of light slowing (Nature Paper)
Shane Killian’s Proposal
Speed of light not slowing
Clarifications
qabalaHCTMRS
How can you have free will or even know the truth if you are determined by the laws of matter, you know matter do it's things dictated by its 4 laws…you are just a bunch of higly organized atoms and you dance at its rithym…no free agency or thinking…jus pure chain reactions inside your skull…you can't really make science.
we have hundreds of examples of colliding galaxies apparently midway through billion year collisions. the mice galaxies have "tails" hundreds of thousands of light years long (of stars) – google the pic and nasa simulation – mice galaxies . faster lightspeed would not account for physical stars moving so far in less than millions of years
Darwin evolution is an unfalsifiable. Therefore it is not science.
2. As light travels slower its frequency drops Is total nonsense. And you can tell this is nonsense just by observing the color of light as it traverses water or glass, where the speed is almost half of what it is in air. The color DOES NOT CHANGE therefor the frequency doesnt change! Red light enters as red light and passes through glass or water as red light. Th's is an easily verifiable fallacy of your dumb argument. Geeze, at least try to get the basic facts right because as it is you are doing both God and creationists a disservice.
1. That is wrong: Observing the time when earth is moving towards or moving away from Jupiter was not the measurement, as this would, if done properly, yield you the same speed. What the measurement really was in fact was measuring the period when the Earth is nearest to and when the Earth is farthest away from Jupiter, thereby having a notable difference in the distance betwixt the two measurements. You really should try to understand the science before you attempt to criticize it.
And what is with that Devils voice mechanism that you are using to narrate? You get that thing from Satan is Us? Brrr.
Who said light has to be the same speed in all directions? We can only observe the two way speed of light.
Sometime in about the late '80s, in one of their monthly issues of Acts & Facts, ICR debunked a YEC's theory of light having started out at an infinite speed, then quickly slowed down. I thought it interesting the lengths someone would go to try and fit reality into a Bible-shaped box, when Christians had to chastise another Christian.
Have bad biblical facts but interesting video
Man I'm about to troll you hard core with all your videos lol you are wrong on a few things and don't give all information. I would love to debate on your channel. Really in person so you have the opportunity to keep your channel going. And I can prove with science what the Bible claims on the creation level. With all religion there is some form of faith which I will always say but evolution is a religion and a lot of evolutionist fail to admit that and it's not testable or observed
0:18 There is no such thing as an 'evolutionist', and evolution has nothing to do with the age of the cosmos or the speed of light. The speed of light is constant, and there is no evidence suggesting it can change whatsoever, much less evidence that it has.
Well, since the speed of light isn't a speed persé, its actually the fastest that anything can move. You can view mass as something that places a limit on speed, there fore anything with mass can only move slower than than light, but anything without mass can only move at C.
The real problem is that if the speed of light could have been different, then so would everything else in proper proportions. If everything else were different in proportion to the speed of light, it would look exactly the same from all reference points as being perfectly consistent over any relative frame of reference.
This means it doesn't matter of the speed of light could have been different in the past, because it would look exactly the same now as if it wasn't, and there would be literally no way to tell the difference.
Very Good history. What comments do yu hav on Dr. Russell Humphry's & Dr. Jason Lisle's explanations of distant starlight reaching earth in Less than a day? PLEASE POST YOUR REPLY ON YOUTUBE.
I’ve always wondered how many of the Stars we see have already gone out long ago. We just don’t realize it yet cause of the distance
Pulled up Isaac Newton’s “Optick.” Awesome.
Free on Google Books. Read
some. Since this is the field in which I
do business, I will actually try and read the thing. Kind of cool trying to read through “ye old
English.” Gotta love the old giant "S."
2:20 of your video you show Einstein’s paper “3. Zur Electrodynamik bewegter Korper.” The first words are ‘Das die Elektrodynamic
Maxwells – …”
Just have to mention, as you know these two, Newton and
Maxwell, were Creationists. Sorry for
the cheap advertisement.
4:10 “..if light travels faster…” 4:35 “…as light travels slower…” Hmm. The speed of light is constant in a vacuum,
right? Only in a medium is velocity
affected. Did I miss something?
4:30 “…completely irradiated on a scorching earth.” Our world seems to be designed perfectly for
life, doesn’t it?
6:07 “Creationists often criticize evolution for being just
a theory, not a fact.” Evolution is “just a theory.” Only “variations within species” seems to
have any true basis in science (“micro-evolution”). Evolution does not answer how living arose
from non-living material. Evolution also
somehow believes mammals arose from pine trees, correct me if I’m wrong. Silly stuff called science by some smart guy
in a lab coat. Absolute nonsense. Sorry.
I am accused of believing in “fairy tales” for believing God made man,
yet evolution (paraphrased from Hoivind) believes “a frog can turn into a
prince, if only you have enough time.”
Friend, even if I rejected creationism, evolutionary “science” does not
make any sense to me.
6:24 “..the creationist proposition unsupported by
scientific findings…” And yet, many of
the great scientists were creationists including Pascal, Newton, Gibbs,
Maxwell, Faraday, Kelvin, Pasteur, etc. Many
of these scientific “juggernauts” opposed evolution and whom you often quote in
your videos. Just because a scientist does
not “mix science and religion” does not mean the position is unsupported or
unscientific, especially if this Being (God) actually created all of the
scientific laws.
6:30 “it is also unsupported by its own predictions.” I will remind you the book of Genesis was not given to tell you how God made things. It
does say He did (Gen 1:1). Tony, I suggest you study fulfilled Bible prophecy a little closer, you may find some
surprises. I am pretty sure you distrust any idea such as this, as would I on the surface level. Worth checking out though. You asked for a new video topic, how about that?
Just started listening to this Henry Neufeld on Daniel. Sharing link just in case you had an interest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eb38Z_sjgQk
Tony, so if I understand the ‘jist’ of your video, the universe
has to be old because the incoming light from very distant stars takes a very
long time to arrive?
Please explain how stars came into being. Big topic, I know. So are most of yours found in your videos. The idea of them forming by an
explosion or by coalescing gases does not seem probable to me. Where did the gravity come from before the star formed?
Thanks for the video.
Have a good “1.”
Ya but what if it wasn’t! Ha check mate atheists!!!
/s
Light, it's fucking dangerous fast or sow
Mmmm, SN 1987A, my favourite object, impossible to squeeze into 6000 years, that object alone scrap the idea of young universe.
Unless you join Jason Isle in the boat and ride out onto the high sea of insanity and accept the idea of infinity light speed toward earth, c/2 of the speed for light leaving earth and the speed of light to c in all other directions.
The beginning is very confusing same voice ,without a pause,for both arguments.
God created light already in route ROFLOL!!
CREATION IS NOT SCIENCE , HOW THE FUCK DO YOU EVEN MAKE A FALSE STATEMENT LIKE THAT
Wait, if the speed of light and its wave frequency are directly proportional, and light travelling faster would lead to it becoming a gamma ray, then that would imply that currently existing gamma rays are faster than light, which is impossible.
If God made the light on rout he should have made images that shouldn't exist, like novas that are reversed.
What about the supernatural? ghosts and spirits?esp? telekinesis
More blind religiousity on the part of the materialists.
I'm a little sad that you didn't address Jason Lisle's position that the speed of light is a "round trip" measurement and travels at different speeds whether coming or going with your gamma/microwave explanation. I hit that argument the other day and honestly had no real response to it but never thought about doppler shift and how it would affect fundamental structure of the waves as they arrived here if they had started only 6000 years ago but are made to appear distant…
God doe's what the hell he want's. He created the stars 14 billion lightyears apart, but the light was shining all over, he is omnipotent you know.
This guy is a phony! Not a creationist! makes fun of creationism. Not even really an authority of science. disregard
was confused until you brought up the gamma rays cooking us to death. you just earned a sub!
what! this has nothing to do with creationism! you're even defending evolutionism!
The actual distance between Earth and any other star can be solved using the Mandelbrot equation.
The universe isn't as big as some think it is.
Deception. Deception. Deception. Misleading titles, misleading claims, misrepresented evidence. How could you trust someone who is so dishonest on a constant basis?
This only shows how desperate the evolutionist is to justify his religion. Evolution is a religion, not a science.
haha this is a great series, i think its the best so far in this area. great work.
Damn, i never thought about that. That since light travels also as a wave that if it was ridiculously fast like proposed than that would means they wouldnt be light anymore. That's pretty open and shut right there.
Such a great series! Totally jealous at your release pace as well. Great work and please keep it up!
It's interesting how changing the speed of light either faster or slower results in killing all life. Actually, it reminds me of an ancient story: Noah and the Microwave Oven. He warned his wife not to leave the door open. But did she listen??
I'm going to correct this video in a few days and a fundamental flaw with this series is you have to assume that there is a god and not only that but also assume that the christian god id true, theories are TESTED 100S OF TIMES IN SCIENCE BEFORE THEY'RE EVEN CONSIDERED THEORIES. And I could follow your whole video just by looking on Wikipedia for each of these subjects and occasionally just skipping parts of it that don't support your assertion that god is true.
Nice one. Here's a little gem of a vid on the same subject that goes more in depth and actually calls out the lying creatard. So far as I can tell this one has not got a lot of views even though it's been around a while. Enjoy!
https://m.youtube.com/?gl=GB&hl=en-GB#/watch?list=FLGziTsxFmR1qffHLzu2UMnw&v=YyD9t9pA3Ns
Yet another great video. I'm glad you shouted out Shane Killian's video. That was one of my favorites. BTW, I have a question. Since E=MC2, does it fallow that a change in C = a change in E? And would that violate the law of conservation of energy? I don't see how you can tweak one variable without changing others. I'd love to have your thoughts on it. Thanks.
Yes, but "were you there?"
Nuh-uh, cuz jebus.
Broke it down nicely in this one Tony, good work!
As it turns out, here we are.
if you change the speed of light, not only would you change the diameter of the universe, but the implications for stellar formation and thermonuclear reactions would completely mess up. look at E=mc2 for example ant the implications.
Would you consider tackling Kalam Cosmological Argument?
Speed of light through space is constant. This video is a joke
Wow! I almost forgot about Shane. He made some great anti creationism vids a few years back and he was always on top of his game when it came to discrediting YEC woo with science and evidence.
Jason Lisle, the wonder boy of creationism based astrophysics, like all creationists of his ilk, contend that the speed of light has the magic property of having different speeds depending on if it is coming or going. Oddly enough, or should I say, I would not expect anything less…the speed of light must have changed and have magical properties given to it by god. How else can it fit into a 6000 year narrative?